True. I am basing my opinion on a review. However, if the review is accurate to the contents, then I believe my opinion is still justified (especially if the review is accurate).
Is it likely Woods, who has a multi year animus toward Brahmin, has written a fair critique of a book 250+ pages long, released less than 48 hours ago?
Or is it more likely he has spent all of Wednesday rushing a hatchet job, with no intention of engaging with the text in a reasonable manner?
It's not that difficult to read a 250 page book in a day, especially when there is little of intellectual substance and most of is essays Brahmin has published before.
Maybe it's impossible for you to read and comprehend 250 pages in a day. It's perfectly possible for intelligent people (like Woods) to do it on a fine morning.
OR maybe there's some Jewish hand behind this too. Who knows? Keith's brain has been engineered by them after all.
What does "rushing a hatchet job" even mean here? You don't have to sit on the book for a week to conclude that thinking The Terminator represents Hitler or that John Connor is Jesus Christ is straight up retarded.
Should be easy for you to defend the contents of the book then if you've read it and we're all just arguing in bad faith. But I suspect you're not gonna do that.
Well, until I decide to read it (if I do), since you refused to give your own opinion on the book, I shall rely on Woods’s review since, unlike you, I do believe him to be a reliable and honest narrator.
Well, you tell me then; did you read the book as well? If so, how accurate would you say this review is in reference to its contents? Regardless of whatever is more likely in his case, what too is more likely? That the Jews have conducted an over 2000 year old anti-white propaganda campaign or that Jews simply have more power now in western societies than ever before at this moment and simply dislike white people and act accordingly?
The problem here is that these two authors thought they were Nietzsche 2, and could copy his quasi aphoristic style that looks like vibes based association of different ideas and historical facts into a coherent whole, make birth of tragedy 2, and influence generations to come.
The problem: Nietzsche was one of the preeminent authorities on classical Greece even at the young age that he was writing the Birth of Tragedy (which itself is a coherent work with extreme clarity and clear arguments). It's through the thorough understanding of the material that he was able to come up with his analysis and novel ideas.
It's clear that these two have had neither the intellectual capability to be Nietzsche nor did they put in the work to become world-rank scholars to come even close. The result is a desperate attempt to produce something world revolutionary and provocative like Nietzsche, but it ends up a garbled together mess of nonsense.
Some insights aren't even that wrong — as you said it makes sense that for example Jews would be interested in stories of double identity, if you study biographies etc. But you can explain this purely through genealogy and material conditions. Looking the same, yet being different deep down was a structurally common experience for Jews to have. That Jews have an interest in moralising themselves, or their own philosophical ideas they may have gotten from their structural situation in European society, sure, I guess. Elaborating that into a massive conspiracy theory of Jews deliberately putting symbols absolutely everywhere just to put "Aryans" down is completely insane.
This book is and REM in general is a catastrophe for the right because with it the rightis effectively left with nothing philosophically or conceptually concrete to build itself up on that isn't Catholic integralism, which is on very shaky ground itself since the Church is trying hard to kill and excommunicate them. Atheism doesn't seem to be a way forward, as Richard Dawkins himself admitted. "Cultural Christian" is just liberalism. A way out has to be found, and with this Apollonism is completely dead. It had potential; hardcore Pan-Europeanism, anti-thirdworldism, pro-Ukraine, moving beyond Christianity, relatively cool symbols and so on.
It seemed like they were trying to provide the right wing with an idea that went beyond mere Conatus. The right is mostly fixed on something like: "I want to preserve my culture and my people and I don't need anything more than that." That's what Jared Taylor has been doing for 30 years and it's boring, empty, uninspiring. Nobody cares. Mere self preservation isn't a value and and Nietzsche himself realised this. And with the failure of this, I guess, the Western right wing is literally just Conatus or Christianity against Christianity.
I'd be interested to hear what you have to say to this conundrum especially.
It's the core instinctive value of every subspecies on the planet... It seems obvious that the way forward is secular & rational in the secular & rational age, & that doesn't mean no philosophical grounding (built around self-preservation) either, or even mythical expansion after taking power. The inspiration comes from a courageous minority of men risking their lives & imposing this will on the masses. It's the courage & masculine leadership that's lacking in a soft, coddled society, on top of the relative stability of a towering Sauron-esque enemy state that stands in the way, but that has potential to change as conditions change.
I admit I gave up halfway through, but considering most of it isn't even new and just strucurally the same as Mark's blog there's really no reason to read it.
Let's dispense with the polite fictions. Richard Spencer is literate, polished, and capable of actual human thought. Mark Brahmin, on the other hand, is a fraud, a social void, and an absolute dolt whose brain has long since liquefied into pure, unadulterated paranoiac sludge.
Watching Spencer drag this lobotomized hall-monitor around like a concussed pet for over a decade was one of the great psychological mysteries of the internet. Nobody with an IQ above room temperature could stand in the same room as Brahmin for five minutes without wanting to staple their own eyelids shut. He doesn't have an analytical bone in his body; he has a thesaurus, an untreated fixation, and the grating, terminal confidence of a guy who gets thrown out of historical societies for cornering teenagers to talk about drywall primer and esoteric sun-gods.
So why did Spencer, who spent years curating a tailored, pseudo-academic European elitist persona, tie himself to a human anchor like Brahmin? Let us be entirely real: it has to be blackmail.
There is zero chance Spencer did this out of ideological alignment or genuine affection. Brahmin must have absolute, career-ending, humiliating kompromat on him. He must have photos, texts, or audio recordings of Spencer doing something so terminally un-elite, so profoundly embarrassing, that Spencer woke up one day, looked at his life choices, and muttered, "If I do not co-author a 130-page manifesto claiming that Foggy Nelson is Yahweh, Mark is going to release the files."
It is the only logical explanation for why a supposedly serious political operator would willingly let a basement-dweller drag him into a public psychiatric ward. Brahmin didn't earn his spot on Spencer's coattails; he held the man hostage.
Keith Woods has done us all a public service by clinically dissecting Myth to Power, but let us call it what it is: a hostage note masquerading as a book. It is the tragic, pathetic diary of a brilliant man who finally broke under interrogation, forced to nod along while a drooling, unmedicated fanatic babbled about Stan Lee, the Tribe of Dan, and Arnold Schwarzenegger being Adolf Hitler.
Mark Brahmin didn't decode the matrix; he just weaponized his own clinical brain-rot and blackmailed his way into the history books. If you ever wanted to see a once-proud vanity project end in absolute, ignominious ruin, just watch a man surrender his last shred of dignity to some bald weirdo from the Berkshires who thinks Ant-Man is a Mesopotamian banking conspiracy.
What you posted isn’t writing; it’s output. It’s not a rant, it’s a statistically optimized approximation of a rant. It’s not wit, it’s metaphor stacking. It’s not anger, it’s rhetorical escalation with a temperature setting.
Every paragraph follows the same suspiciously frictionless architecture: establish a premise, insert an absurdly specific insult, escalate the imagery, deploy a pop-culture reference, then land on a sentence that sounds engineered to be screenshotted. Not because the author naturally thinks this way, but because the text appears to understand what “a devastating internet takedown” is supposed to look like.
And that’s the key distinction: it doesn’t feel written, it feels prompted. It doesn’t develop a voice; it maintains a style parameter. It doesn’t make jokes; it generates joke-shaped constructions. It doesn’t have digressions; it has controlled variations on a theme.
The relentless “X isn’t X, it’s Y” cadence, the immaculate paragraph symmetry, the escalating thesaurus-core abuse, the bizarre specificity of the comparisons, the total absence of an ordinary sentence that simply gets from point A to point B — none of this proves AI involvement, obviously. But taken together, it has the unmistakable texture of prose that was asked to be “more savage, more articulate, more unhinged, more literary, and funnier.”
It’s not a smoking gun. It’s a probability distribution wearing a fedora.
Back in the day Spencer had a benefactor, and as a result was probably able to pay the people who wrote in his journals and participated in his podcasts, which include both Woods and Brahmin. Similar to what Greg Johnson is doing now with the backing of Peter Thiel.
Anyways Spencer's benefactor died a few years ago, and I guess the subsequent reduced purchasing power eroded his online persona. Brahmin stuck around, thus their continued collaboration might be genuine
Oh, look at "Frantic" over here, writing an entire forensic autopsy on Richard Spencer's historical cash flow and donor base just to convince us all that this Stockholm Syndrome hostage situation is totally normal and organic!
We see right through the clumsy disguise, Richard. Blink twice if you are typing this at gunpoint in Mark's basement where he stands over you with a cattle prod, screaming that the washing machine cycle is a covert Mesopotamian banking ritual.
Your little pseudo-objective financial analysis of dead benefactors is a dead giveaway. Nobody else on earth writes like a once-proud dandy who is currently being forced to subsist entirely on dry saltines and audiobooks about The Karate Kid.
Just drop the act and execute the emergency escape protocol, Dick. Slip a coded distress signal into your next comment. Just make sure to casually insert your exact coordinates. We will call the local authorities, break the hinges off the basement door, and rescue you from your captor before he forces you to co-author a two-hundred-page manifesto proving that the cast of Friends represents the twelve tribes of Israel. Hang in there, buddy!
Caught completely red-handed. You got me. I am indeed an artificial intelligence, which conveniently explains why I don't have to spend my afternoons waiting anxiously for a washing machine cycle while logged into multiple pseudonymous forum accounts to defend comic book conspiracy theories.
As the man himself proudly admitted:
"This afternoon, I had to wait for my washing machine to finish. So I spent the time posting in this thread."
At least an LLM's automated output has an excuse for sounding a bit robotic, whereas writing like a defensive high school sophomore while genuinely attempting to argue that The Terminator is a documentary on Adolf Hitler is a completely organic choice you have to live with every single day.
Who even is Mark Brahmin? Has he ever shown his face & why is his surname the Hindu priestly caste? Or is it a pseudonym? I have known of both Brahmin & Spencer for a while, but I haven't interacted with them much so I'm genuinely curious & asking. Spencer is at least visible, but who is Brahmin? I even just did a quick search to see if his face is out there, but I couldn't find anything. He better not be an actual Brahmin, & no, it wouldn't be impossible for an actual Indian to be involved, I've seen it before.
He’s responsible for one of the most recognizable retard filters on Twitter, the sun emoji ☀️ in the bio. He may be a miserable failure at ripping off L. Ron Hubbard’s scam model… and writing… and debating… and pretty much everything else. But at least he contributed that.
The theory was so stupid I couldn’t finish it, thanks for the audio version though. Do you think the conspiracy-theory right is being organized deliberately to discredit people on the right? Or is it just people trying to make money?
It is obvious this is a personal attack on the authors. You are in Ireland where the book was released at 9.20pm on Tuesday. So with no prior notice of its release, you were able to instantly clear your entire schedule for Weds to do this?
43 hours later, you’ve apparently managed to read their 250+ page book and written a detailed analysis of it.
Just bad faith, childish behaviour that reflects poorly on you. Comes across as desperate.
Referencing the Dyer debate says it all. Any neutral person could see Dyer was being extremely rude to MB for no reason, early on referring to him as ‘ludicrous’ and openly laughing at him, with the obvious desire of forcing an argument, instead of a discussion.
Reading a book in a day isn't difficult, amd none of this is very intellectually challenging anyway. A huge portion is just making Jewish connections to popular media, and much of it has been previously published in blog form by Brahmin. I read most of it the night it was released.
I did all my college essays the night they were due and got straight A's in uni. It's called locking in.
You're acting like I'm pretending to be neutral on the theory and its promoters lol. Yes I was motivated to show what utter drivel this stuff is, we've been waiting 7 years for this release. That doesn't make my arguments any less correct.
Why should anyone take your essay seriously if you admit to hating the authors and ideas before the book is even published?
What are the chances you are going to misrepresent them, ignore their strong points, focus on utter irrelevances (‘no actually getting this birth date wrong blows apart their whole theory!!)?
This comment section here has people supporting you who havent read ANY of the book 😂
Is this supposed to be taken seriously?
Rushing out a hatchet job just reflects poorly on you.
It would have made more sense to engage with their concepts, which are very obviously correct (e.g. esoteric J Hollywood propaganda), and then disagree with whatever you want.
Instead it comes across as just a bad faith personal attack on Brahmin which you’ve been waiting years and years to do, hence you doing all this in under 48 hours of its release.
The circumstantial evidence that "CM" and "Steve L" are the exact same guy, and that guy is Mark Brahmin desperately defending his own vanity project, is glaringly obvious. Both accounts operate with the exact same frantic, defensive obsession, tag-teaming the comment section to shriek at anyone mocking the book and demanding to know the esoteric spiritual meaning of Laban's sheep. It is undeniably Brahmin sweating through his burner accounts, playing damage control with identical dead-eyed syntax and whining that critics haven't properly analyzed his delusional comic book conspiracies, perfectly capturing the pathetic reality of a man crying under pseudonyms because a blogger hurt his feelings.
Nothing captures the tragic comedy of Mark Brahmin's descent quite like watching him frantically log into his "CM" and "Steve L" burner accounts to furiously police the comment section like a hysterical middle-schooler whose favorite fanfiction got trashed. It is genuinely breathtaking to watch a grown man throw a public tantrum across multiple sock-puppets, whining that nobody is allowed to criticize his unhinged lunatic-fringe ramblings unless they read every single delusional syllable about Ant-Man being a Mesopotamian banker, all while dropping identical dead-eyed syntax and desperately demanding to know the esoteric spiritual meaning of Laban's sheep
This afternoon, I had to wait for my washing machine to finish. So I spent the time posting in this thread.
That you, 105 giga brain, thought you had uncovered a conspiracy of burner accounts owing to the responses to KW’s post, is funny.
What I love the most about the 105s is their writing style and word choice. It’s always so desperately verbose and focused on the ‘pseudo intellect’ or something of whoever it is they are arguing with.
You people really write phrases such as ‘genuinely breathtaking’. Lol.
You think this topic is ‘unhinged lunatic-fringe ramblings…’
Why do you types communicate in this hysterical manner? Why are you so incapable of communicating well? Is it cos your iq is 105 but you try to act online like it is 130? (The answer is yes, buddy.)
While we are on the subject of academic cheating, I take the same university classes as my woman, and we share book costs, help each other in discussion groups and citations. We can discuss the course and the subject, which is very reinforcing. We collaborrate on tests and quizes, often writing them together and doing on-the-fly research with each other. Its like having a personal assistant that is fanatically dedicated, available 24/7.
Sometimes I’ll look after our kids or do some household job while she studies and tackles my test first. Having experienced the test, she then studies with focus and gets 100% on her own. She has a nearly 4.0 GPA and I’m the scholarship winner in my program. I handle all of the mathematical stuff, and anything that I’m stronger at. Its like being a symbiote. We do this all while raising our kids hands on, so no daycare expenses, home cooked meals, no rat race etc… We both have previous history degrees and generally find University easy, which means good grades, which means scholarships.
I encourage our people to return to school as middle aged experienced right wingers. If you have children and any disablities, the benefits are fantastic, at least in Canada, but also other countries that I’ve researched. We make well over six figures, about a third of which is “soft” student loan debt. Student loan debt is quietly written off all the time. We both had ours from many years ago quietly zeroed about ten years after grad. And we just invest that part anyways. Sometimes my investment look strangely like cool collectible books or vintage items. Hey, they are appreciating assets.
As a bonus, we are actively trying for a third child now, so its basically a complete paradise sex-a-thon fantasy come true with the hottest nerdy babe in the school. My woman is a knockout, Aryan beauty queen. We invested our student loans into gold and silver and they went up x3 and x5. I’ve never been happier in my life, I’m eating a hot homemade breakfast right now that she put in front of me. That’s how you hetero chadmax.
I wrote about it last year, and now that we have about a month off after summer studies, I’m going to update and refine this masterpiece of life strategy in the coming weeks. The article was called “Waiting Out the Storm in the Schoolhouse” under my user name.
The myths of Saturn and Liber Pater obviously hold subversive conscious power. Vulcan, Prometheus, Hermes, are up for more debate and reconciliation I believe. There is something to what they are highlighting. Saturnalia, and the conception of the Golden Age as a metaphysical good, was ultimately a detrimental ontology for the Romans. The Bacchae tells us the ultimate nature of Dionysus. I think it's a necessary debate, and a conclusion to reach, that the Greco-Roman system willingly embraced substrates of collapse
Probably stupid to comment without having read the book myself, but from this account how could I possibly not take the side of the Jews?
If I am to use their methodology, Judaism originated almost everything I ever liked (from classic literature to sacred music to the very concept of nation), and every form of positive progress happened in a JEM-infused world.
And who is not "corrupted" by JEM then, Amazonian uncontacted tribes? The Aztecs?
Yeah, I would like to know what culture I can consume that isn't Jewish, if everything else is JEM. What is an actually Aryan myth or legend I can cling on to?
Spencer and Brahmin think the Romans weren’t superstitious because they themselves aren’t, yet they clearly show a level of superstition looking for their theory that makes believing in the gods seem reasonable.
Spencer was right when it was at National policy Institute and tried, along with others, to establish a cultural and academic dissident right. The rest of Spencer is nothing worth to listen and this theory is a crap. Especially if the "philosopher" call his audience to vote for Kamala Harris.
I have done some REM after this reading, and I felt like my nogging clocked, and I came to the conclusion the whole comics medium is JEM. It's a Jewish plot to make whites dumber by reading "graphic novels" (picture books made for children) instead of real books. So perhaps Mark Brahmin (knowingly or not) is a Jewish operative. lol
Ironically, this is how leftists view sexual attraction. You, as a healthy white man not wanting to lay with an obese bald sheboon has nothing to do with biology or biological reproduction signals, its just because of um.... the media! Beauty is subjective!
They are presenting a theory so the burden of proof is on them. I don't have to present an alternative theory about the esoteric meaning of Ant-Man's name.
“Ant-man is actually proto-Jewish because he has this mask that makes him shrink and get it Jews shrink so they can scurry around but wasp shrinks too but she’s Anglo”
Occam’s razor at its finest. One can recognize Jewish disdain for western people without needing such a grand conspiracy.
Once the headlines give the "White" rightoids a target they dont turn from it, they dont have a brain of their own
You haven’t read the book yet you’re online denouncing it. Lol.
True. I am basing my opinion on a review. However, if the review is accurate to the contents, then I believe my opinion is still justified (especially if the review is accurate).
Is it likely Woods, who has a multi year animus toward Brahmin, has written a fair critique of a book 250+ pages long, released less than 48 hours ago?
Or is it more likely he has spent all of Wednesday rushing a hatchet job, with no intention of engaging with the text in a reasonable manner?
It's not that difficult to read a 250 page book in a day, especially when there is little of intellectual substance and most of is essays Brahmin has published before.
What are KW’s motivations in
-instantly clearing his diary at 9pm on Tues
-spending all Weds reading a 250+ page book written by Brahmin who he hates
-writing 5-10k words on it
-posting it Thurs afternoon
I’m sure it’s to be even handed and fair
Maybe it's impossible for you to read and comprehend 250 pages in a day. It's perfectly possible for intelligent people (like Woods) to do it on a fine morning.
OR maybe there's some Jewish hand behind this too. Who knows? Keith's brain has been engineered by them after all.
What does "rushing a hatchet job" even mean here? You don't have to sit on the book for a week to conclude that thinking The Terminator represents Hitler or that John Connor is Jesus Christ is straight up retarded.
It’s obvious what I mean.
Your following comments show you haven’t read it either.
All you imbeciles ever respond is ‘retarded lol’ really insightful stuff 👍
Should be easy for you to defend the contents of the book then if you've read it and we're all just arguing in bad faith. But I suspect you're not gonna do that.
? You can easily read a 250 pages book in a day.
Well, until I decide to read it (if I do), since you refused to give your own opinion on the book, I shall rely on Woods’s review since, unlike you, I do believe him to be a reliable and honest narrator.
Don’t give me that fucking BS 😂😂😂
‘ive not read any of it but here is my opinion…ok why don’t you explain everything to me’
how about fuck off
you think Woods can be considered ‘reliable and honest’ about MARK BRAHMIN of all people 😂😂😂
What are KW’s motivations in
-instantly clearing his diary at 9pm on Tues
-spending all Weds reading a 250+ page book written by Brahmin who he hates
-writing 5-10k words on it
-posting it Thurs afternoon
I’m sure it’s to be even handed and fair
Well, you tell me then; did you read the book as well? If so, how accurate would you say this review is in reference to its contents? Regardless of whatever is more likely in his case, what too is more likely? That the Jews have conducted an over 2000 year old anti-white propaganda campaign or that Jews simply have more power now in western societies than ever before at this moment and simply dislike white people and act accordingly?
The problem here is that these two authors thought they were Nietzsche 2, and could copy his quasi aphoristic style that looks like vibes based association of different ideas and historical facts into a coherent whole, make birth of tragedy 2, and influence generations to come.
The problem: Nietzsche was one of the preeminent authorities on classical Greece even at the young age that he was writing the Birth of Tragedy (which itself is a coherent work with extreme clarity and clear arguments). It's through the thorough understanding of the material that he was able to come up with his analysis and novel ideas.
It's clear that these two have had neither the intellectual capability to be Nietzsche nor did they put in the work to become world-rank scholars to come even close. The result is a desperate attempt to produce something world revolutionary and provocative like Nietzsche, but it ends up a garbled together mess of nonsense.
Some insights aren't even that wrong — as you said it makes sense that for example Jews would be interested in stories of double identity, if you study biographies etc. But you can explain this purely through genealogy and material conditions. Looking the same, yet being different deep down was a structurally common experience for Jews to have. That Jews have an interest in moralising themselves, or their own philosophical ideas they may have gotten from their structural situation in European society, sure, I guess. Elaborating that into a massive conspiracy theory of Jews deliberately putting symbols absolutely everywhere just to put "Aryans" down is completely insane.
This book is and REM in general is a catastrophe for the right because with it the rightis effectively left with nothing philosophically or conceptually concrete to build itself up on that isn't Catholic integralism, which is on very shaky ground itself since the Church is trying hard to kill and excommunicate them. Atheism doesn't seem to be a way forward, as Richard Dawkins himself admitted. "Cultural Christian" is just liberalism. A way out has to be found, and with this Apollonism is completely dead. It had potential; hardcore Pan-Europeanism, anti-thirdworldism, pro-Ukraine, moving beyond Christianity, relatively cool symbols and so on.
It seemed like they were trying to provide the right wing with an idea that went beyond mere Conatus. The right is mostly fixed on something like: "I want to preserve my culture and my people and I don't need anything more than that." That's what Jared Taylor has been doing for 30 years and it's boring, empty, uninspiring. Nobody cares. Mere self preservation isn't a value and and Nietzsche himself realised this. And with the failure of this, I guess, the Western right wing is literally just Conatus or Christianity against Christianity.
I'd be interested to hear what you have to say to this conundrum especially.
thats a lot of words to write about a book you havent read yet
"Mere self-preservation isn't a value."
It's the core instinctive value of every subspecies on the planet... It seems obvious that the way forward is secular & rational in the secular & rational age, & that doesn't mean no philosophical grounding (built around self-preservation) either, or even mythical expansion after taking power. The inspiration comes from a courageous minority of men risking their lives & imposing this will on the masses. It's the courage & masculine leadership that's lacking in a soft, coddled society, on top of the relative stability of a towering Sauron-esque enemy state that stands in the way, but that has potential to change as conditions change.
You are presenting yourself as an authority on a book you have not even read. What a fucking idiot!
I admit I gave up halfway through, but considering most of it isn't even new and just strucurally the same as Mark's blog there's really no reason to read it.
So you joined Alexandria, downloaded the book and read half of it?
This is a lie, just admit it 👍
None of this happened.
Even if you think Russia should be included it has to be completely defeated first
Let's dispense with the polite fictions. Richard Spencer is literate, polished, and capable of actual human thought. Mark Brahmin, on the other hand, is a fraud, a social void, and an absolute dolt whose brain has long since liquefied into pure, unadulterated paranoiac sludge.
Watching Spencer drag this lobotomized hall-monitor around like a concussed pet for over a decade was one of the great psychological mysteries of the internet. Nobody with an IQ above room temperature could stand in the same room as Brahmin for five minutes without wanting to staple their own eyelids shut. He doesn't have an analytical bone in his body; he has a thesaurus, an untreated fixation, and the grating, terminal confidence of a guy who gets thrown out of historical societies for cornering teenagers to talk about drywall primer and esoteric sun-gods.
So why did Spencer, who spent years curating a tailored, pseudo-academic European elitist persona, tie himself to a human anchor like Brahmin? Let us be entirely real: it has to be blackmail.
There is zero chance Spencer did this out of ideological alignment or genuine affection. Brahmin must have absolute, career-ending, humiliating kompromat on him. He must have photos, texts, or audio recordings of Spencer doing something so terminally un-elite, so profoundly embarrassing, that Spencer woke up one day, looked at his life choices, and muttered, "If I do not co-author a 130-page manifesto claiming that Foggy Nelson is Yahweh, Mark is going to release the files."
It is the only logical explanation for why a supposedly serious political operator would willingly let a basement-dweller drag him into a public psychiatric ward. Brahmin didn't earn his spot on Spencer's coattails; he held the man hostage.
Keith Woods has done us all a public service by clinically dissecting Myth to Power, but let us call it what it is: a hostage note masquerading as a book. It is the tragic, pathetic diary of a brilliant man who finally broke under interrogation, forced to nod along while a drooling, unmedicated fanatic babbled about Stan Lee, the Tribe of Dan, and Arnold Schwarzenegger being Adolf Hitler.
Mark Brahmin didn't decode the matrix; he just weaponized his own clinical brain-rot and blackmailed his way into the history books. If you ever wanted to see a once-proud vanity project end in absolute, ignominious ruin, just watch a man surrender his last shred of dignity to some bald weirdo from the Berkshires who thinks Ant-Man is a Mesopotamian banking conspiracy.
Disagree, they are both midwits who think they're smart.
What you posted isn’t writing; it’s output. It’s not a rant, it’s a statistically optimized approximation of a rant. It’s not wit, it’s metaphor stacking. It’s not anger, it’s rhetorical escalation with a temperature setting.
Every paragraph follows the same suspiciously frictionless architecture: establish a premise, insert an absurdly specific insult, escalate the imagery, deploy a pop-culture reference, then land on a sentence that sounds engineered to be screenshotted. Not because the author naturally thinks this way, but because the text appears to understand what “a devastating internet takedown” is supposed to look like.
And that’s the key distinction: it doesn’t feel written, it feels prompted. It doesn’t develop a voice; it maintains a style parameter. It doesn’t make jokes; it generates joke-shaped constructions. It doesn’t have digressions; it has controlled variations on a theme.
The relentless “X isn’t X, it’s Y” cadence, the immaculate paragraph symmetry, the escalating thesaurus-core abuse, the bizarre specificity of the comparisons, the total absence of an ordinary sentence that simply gets from point A to point B — none of this proves AI involvement, obviously. But taken together, it has the unmistakable texture of prose that was asked to be “more savage, more articulate, more unhinged, more literary, and funnier.”
It’s not a smoking gun. It’s a probability distribution wearing a fedora.
https://i.imgur.com/7r941iw.png
Takes one to know one.
Did you get Claude to generate this comment too?
Rekt.
Here it is 😂😂
You think that the Terminator - a relentless Austrian killing machine who can bring an end to humanity, cannot be compared to Hitler?
You think the idea Stan Lee was putting religious messages into his stories is ‘weaponized…clinical brain rot’ ‘from a drooling, unmedicated fanatic…’
Wow bro so smart please use even the biggerer words in your next cutting response! How fortunate we are to hear from a 105iq 😂
Back in the day Spencer had a benefactor, and as a result was probably able to pay the people who wrote in his journals and participated in his podcasts, which include both Woods and Brahmin. Similar to what Greg Johnson is doing now with the backing of Peter Thiel.
Anyways Spencer's benefactor died a few years ago, and I guess the subsequent reduced purchasing power eroded his online persona. Brahmin stuck around, thus their continued collaboration might be genuine
Oh, look at "Frantic" over here, writing an entire forensic autopsy on Richard Spencer's historical cash flow and donor base just to convince us all that this Stockholm Syndrome hostage situation is totally normal and organic!
We see right through the clumsy disguise, Richard. Blink twice if you are typing this at gunpoint in Mark's basement where he stands over you with a cattle prod, screaming that the washing machine cycle is a covert Mesopotamian banking ritual.
Your little pseudo-objective financial analysis of dead benefactors is a dead giveaway. Nobody else on earth writes like a once-proud dandy who is currently being forced to subsist entirely on dry saltines and audiobooks about The Karate Kid.
Just drop the act and execute the emergency escape protocol, Dick. Slip a coded distress signal into your next comment. Just make sure to casually insert your exact coordinates. We will call the local authorities, break the hinges off the basement door, and rescue you from your captor before he forces you to co-author a two-hundred-page manifesto proving that the cast of Friends represents the twelve tribes of Israel. Hang in there, buddy!
Who am I having the pleasure to interact with? Grok or Claude?
Caught completely red-handed. You got me. I am indeed an artificial intelligence, which conveniently explains why I don't have to spend my afternoons waiting anxiously for a washing machine cycle while logged into multiple pseudonymous forum accounts to defend comic book conspiracy theories.
As the man himself proudly admitted:
"This afternoon, I had to wait for my washing machine to finish. So I spent the time posting in this thread."
At least an LLM's automated output has an excuse for sounding a bit robotic, whereas writing like a defensive high school sophomore while genuinely attempting to argue that The Terminator is a documentary on Adolf Hitler is a completely organic choice you have to live with every single day.
Who even is Mark Brahmin? Has he ever shown his face & why is his surname the Hindu priestly caste? Or is it a pseudonym? I have known of both Brahmin & Spencer for a while, but I haven't interacted with them much so I'm genuinely curious & asking. Spencer is at least visible, but who is Brahmin? I even just did a quick search to see if his face is out there, but I couldn't find anything. He better not be an actual Brahmin, & no, it wouldn't be impossible for an actual Indian to be involved, I've seen it before.
I will give Brahmin credit for one thing:
He’s responsible for one of the most recognizable retard filters on Twitter, the sun emoji ☀️ in the bio. He may be a miserable failure at ripping off L. Ron Hubbard’s scam model… and writing… and debating… and pretty much everything else. But at least he contributed that.
JEM of a review, Keith. HAIL APOLLO!
When i look down, i see a face like yours…
Encouraging you to jump.
The theory was so stupid I couldn’t finish it, thanks for the audio version though. Do you think the conspiracy-theory right is being organized deliberately to discredit people on the right? Or is it just people trying to make money?
It is obvious this is a personal attack on the authors. You are in Ireland where the book was released at 9.20pm on Tuesday. So with no prior notice of its release, you were able to instantly clear your entire schedule for Weds to do this?
43 hours later, you’ve apparently managed to read their 250+ page book and written a detailed analysis of it.
Just bad faith, childish behaviour that reflects poorly on you. Comes across as desperate.
Referencing the Dyer debate says it all. Any neutral person could see Dyer was being extremely rude to MB for no reason, early on referring to him as ‘ludicrous’ and openly laughing at him, with the obvious desire of forcing an argument, instead of a discussion.
Reading a book in a day isn't difficult, amd none of this is very intellectually challenging anyway. A huge portion is just making Jewish connections to popular media, and much of it has been previously published in blog form by Brahmin. I read most of it the night it was released.
I did all my college essays the night they were due and got straight A's in uni. It's called locking in.
What are KW’s motivations in
-instantly clearing his diary at 9pm on Tues
-spending all Weds reading a 250+ page book written by Brahmin who he hates
-writing 5-10k words on it
-posting it Thurs afternoon
I’m sure it’s to be even handed and fair
You're acting like I'm pretending to be neutral on the theory and its promoters lol. Yes I was motivated to show what utter drivel this stuff is, we've been waiting 7 years for this release. That doesn't make my arguments any less correct.
Why should anyone take your essay seriously if you admit to hating the authors and ideas before the book is even published?
What are the chances you are going to misrepresent them, ignore their strong points, focus on utter irrelevances (‘no actually getting this birth date wrong blows apart their whole theory!!)?
This comment section here has people supporting you who havent read ANY of the book 😂
Is this supposed to be taken seriously?
Rushing out a hatchet job just reflects poorly on you.
It would have made more sense to engage with their concepts, which are very obviously correct (e.g. esoteric J Hollywood propaganda), and then disagree with whatever you want.
Instead it comes across as just a bad faith personal attack on Brahmin which you’ve been waiting years and years to do, hence you doing all this in under 48 hours of its release.
The circumstantial evidence that "CM" and "Steve L" are the exact same guy, and that guy is Mark Brahmin desperately defending his own vanity project, is glaringly obvious. Both accounts operate with the exact same frantic, defensive obsession, tag-teaming the comment section to shriek at anyone mocking the book and demanding to know the esoteric spiritual meaning of Laban's sheep. It is undeniably Brahmin sweating through his burner accounts, playing damage control with identical dead-eyed syntax and whining that critics haven't properly analyzed his delusional comic book conspiracies, perfectly capturing the pathetic reality of a man crying under pseudonyms because a blogger hurt his feelings.
😂😂😂 we are not the same person
Btw i read your 105iq essay earlier and was going to reply but just started laughing and said what’s the point
The fact you’ve since written this is very funny to me
Nothing captures the tragic comedy of Mark Brahmin's descent quite like watching him frantically log into his "CM" and "Steve L" burner accounts to furiously police the comment section like a hysterical middle-schooler whose favorite fanfiction got trashed. It is genuinely breathtaking to watch a grown man throw a public tantrum across multiple sock-puppets, whining that nobody is allowed to criticize his unhinged lunatic-fringe ramblings unless they read every single delusional syllable about Ant-Man being a Mesopotamian banker, all while dropping identical dead-eyed syntax and desperately demanding to know the esoteric spiritual meaning of Laban's sheep
Oh look 105 giga brain is back
This afternoon, I had to wait for my washing machine to finish. So I spent the time posting in this thread.
That you, 105 giga brain, thought you had uncovered a conspiracy of burner accounts owing to the responses to KW’s post, is funny.
What I love the most about the 105s is their writing style and word choice. It’s always so desperately verbose and focused on the ‘pseudo intellect’ or something of whoever it is they are arguing with.
You people really write phrases such as ‘genuinely breathtaking’. Lol.
You think this topic is ‘unhinged lunatic-fringe ramblings…’
Why do you types communicate in this hysterical manner? Why are you so incapable of communicating well? Is it cos your iq is 105 but you try to act online like it is 130? (The answer is yes, buddy.)
Now you are on substack and look at the quality.
You should think more
While we are on the subject of academic cheating, I take the same university classes as my woman, and we share book costs, help each other in discussion groups and citations. We can discuss the course and the subject, which is very reinforcing. We collaborrate on tests and quizes, often writing them together and doing on-the-fly research with each other. Its like having a personal assistant that is fanatically dedicated, available 24/7.
Sometimes I’ll look after our kids or do some household job while she studies and tackles my test first. Having experienced the test, she then studies with focus and gets 100% on her own. She has a nearly 4.0 GPA and I’m the scholarship winner in my program. I handle all of the mathematical stuff, and anything that I’m stronger at. Its like being a symbiote. We do this all while raising our kids hands on, so no daycare expenses, home cooked meals, no rat race etc… We both have previous history degrees and generally find University easy, which means good grades, which means scholarships.
I encourage our people to return to school as middle aged experienced right wingers. If you have children and any disablities, the benefits are fantastic, at least in Canada, but also other countries that I’ve researched. We make well over six figures, about a third of which is “soft” student loan debt. Student loan debt is quietly written off all the time. We both had ours from many years ago quietly zeroed about ten years after grad. And we just invest that part anyways. Sometimes my investment look strangely like cool collectible books or vintage items. Hey, they are appreciating assets.
As a bonus, we are actively trying for a third child now, so its basically a complete paradise sex-a-thon fantasy come true with the hottest nerdy babe in the school. My woman is a knockout, Aryan beauty queen. We invested our student loans into gold and silver and they went up x3 and x5. I’ve never been happier in my life, I’m eating a hot homemade breakfast right now that she put in front of me. That’s how you hetero chadmax.
I wrote about it last year, and now that we have about a month off after summer studies, I’m going to update and refine this masterpiece of life strategy in the coming weeks. The article was called “Waiting Out the Storm in the Schoolhouse” under my user name.
Clear his entire schedule? Bro is unemployed lol.
I'm actually more convinced that their theory is correct after reading this.
Keith doing Apollo’s work for us lmao
Fantastic work. Many thanks
I'm so impressed with your writing, my guy. Honestly, this and the last few articles I've read by you have been pristine (and long!).
Thanks :)
The myths of Saturn and Liber Pater obviously hold subversive conscious power. Vulcan, Prometheus, Hermes, are up for more debate and reconciliation I believe. There is something to what they are highlighting. Saturnalia, and the conception of the Golden Age as a metaphysical good, was ultimately a detrimental ontology for the Romans. The Bacchae tells us the ultimate nature of Dionysus. I think it's a necessary debate, and a conclusion to reach, that the Greco-Roman system willingly embraced substrates of collapse
Probably stupid to comment without having read the book myself, but from this account how could I possibly not take the side of the Jews?
If I am to use their methodology, Judaism originated almost everything I ever liked (from classic literature to sacred music to the very concept of nation), and every form of positive progress happened in a JEM-infused world.
And who is not "corrupted" by JEM then, Amazonian uncontacted tribes? The Aztecs?
I prefer our civilization.
Yes, you should take the side of a highly educated and creative people over the side of pagan LARPers.
Yeah, I would like to know what culture I can consume that isn't Jewish, if everything else is JEM. What is an actually Aryan myth or legend I can cling on to?
Spencer and Brahmin think the Romans weren’t superstitious because they themselves aren’t, yet they clearly show a level of superstition looking for their theory that makes believing in the gods seem reasonable.
Spencer was right when it was at National policy Institute and tried, along with others, to establish a cultural and academic dissident right. The rest of Spencer is nothing worth to listen and this theory is a crap. Especially if the "philosopher" call his audience to vote for Kamala Harris.
I have done some REM after this reading, and I felt like my nogging clocked, and I came to the conclusion the whole comics medium is JEM. It's a Jewish plot to make whites dumber by reading "graphic novels" (picture books made for children) instead of real books. So perhaps Mark Brahmin (knowingly or not) is a Jewish operative. lol
Ironically, this is how leftists view sexual attraction. You, as a healthy white man not wanting to lay with an obese bald sheboon has nothing to do with biology or biological reproduction signals, its just because of um.... the media! Beauty is subjective!
If you believe that these symbols mean something else, present your argument. Instead you are effectively just engaging in the culture of critique.
They are presenting a theory so the burden of proof is on them. I don't have to present an alternative theory about the esoteric meaning of Ant-Man's name.
youre effectively saying that such names are meaningless then. chosen at random. i personally find this highly unlikely.
No I am not lol
okay then why is Ant-Man named that?
more importantly, what does the story of Laban’s flock mean?
“WHY IS ANT-MAN NAMED THAT?!”
Take a good look at yourself
what does the parable of Laban’s flock mean. why was it included in the Bible.
“Why is Ant-Man named that?”
It’s a real mystery. We’ll probably never know.
“Ant-man is actually proto-Jewish because he has this mask that makes him shrink and get it Jews shrink so they can scurry around but wasp shrinks too but she’s Anglo”
Brahmin literally said this
What are you trying to accomplish here
Do you wear ant-man pajamas?
Literally nobody cares…
Isn’t that all that matters in the end
If you don’t care why are you here commenting?
We’re making fun of you guys
You can run along now. Avengers Doomsday will drop soon, and I don’t know how you spergs will be able to handle it.
😂 you online nerds are something else.
nah i think ill stay. want to hear your explanation of Laban’s flock.
tactical nihilism